Next Article in Journal
Studying the Gene Expression of Penicillium rubens Under the Effect of Eight Essential Oils
Next Article in Special Issue
Spectrum and Antibiotic Resistance of Uropathogens in Romanian Females
Previous Article in Journal
Alkaloids from Marine Fungi: Promising Antimicrobials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antibiotic Resistance in Nosocomial Bacteria Isolated from Infected Wounds of Hospitalized Patients in Czech Republic

1
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, and University Hospital, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic
2
Department of Microbiology, Thomayer Hospital, 140 59 Prague, Czech Republic
3
Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Charles University Medical School and University Hospital, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
4
Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence, 500 01 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2020, 9(6), 342; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9060342
Submission received: 6 May 2020 / Revised: 5 June 2020 / Accepted: 17 June 2020 / Published: 18 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Alternatives against Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens)

Abstract

:
Hospitalized patients with wounds face an increased risk of infection with multi-drug-resistant nosocomial bacteria. In this study, samples from almost 10,000 patients from big hospitals in Czech Republic with infected wounds were analyzed for the presence of bacterial pathogens. In 7693 patients (78.8%), bacterial etiological agents were identified. Members of the Enterobacterales (37.1%) and Staphyloccus aureus (21.1%) were the most prevalent pathogens. Staphyloccus aureus showed methicillin resistance in 8.6%. Almost half of the Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were ESBL-positive and 25.6% of the Enterobacter spp. isolates were AmpC-positive. The third most prevalent Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed resistance to 19–32% of the antipseudomonal antibiotics tested. Based on the results, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin/sulbactam or piperacillin/tazobactam combined with gentamicin can be recommended for antibiotic treatment of infected wounds. Once the etiological agent is identified, the therapy should be adjusted according to the species and its resistance.

1. Introduction

Bacterial skin and soft tissues infections (SSTIs) include, in order of severity, various manifestations, such as impetigo, folliculitis, furuncle, carbuncle, erysipelas, cellulitis, fasciitis and myonecrosis. In addition, other similar infections, such as infected decubitus ulcers and leg ulcers, as well as bacterial infections of surgical wounds, which are often caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp., members of the Enterobacterales order and Gram-negative non-fermenting bacteria, are usually recognized as a part of SSTIs [1]. At the same time, one of the most pressing issues in medical care worldwide is the increasing resistance of various bacterial strains to the antibiotic treatment [2]. This applies to the infected decubitus and leg ulcers, and bacterial infections of surgical wounds, where often the causative agents are multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. This can lead to a failure of the antibiotic therapy with all the negative effects on the overall clinical status. It means a higher mortality and shorter survival of the patients with infections caused by the MDR bacteria due to the development of complications, such as systemic infections, sepsis and septic shock [3,4]. Tumbarello et al. reported that the mortality of patients with systemic infections caused by Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL)-positive enterobacteria reached 60% in cases with an inadequate antibiotic therapy, while in those where the appropriate antibiotic was used it decreased to 19% [5]. Trecarichi et al. showed that the mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies associated with bloodstream infections caused by MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains was as high as 40%, while the susceptible strains of the same bacteria led to the death of 9% of the patients [6]. Another study has shown that there was a statistically significant difference between the adequacy of the antibiotic treatment and the mortality of patients suffering from ventilator-associated pneumonia. Thus, if the causative bacteria were resistant to the initial antibiotic therapy, the mortality reached 46%, while in case of susceptible bacterial strains it was 27% [7].
The therapy of infected decubitus and leg ulcers and bacterial infections of surgical wounds consists of the local application of antibiotics, but a systemic application is often warranted as well. That, however, bears a potential risk of the selection of the MDR bacterial species, which, in turn, leads to a lower effectivity of the antibiotic treatment with an increased morbidity and mortality in these infections [5,6,7]. One of the promising ways to find novel therapeutic approaches and address the problem of increased bacterial resistance, is to search for or develop novel antibacterial compounds. Among these, extracts from hops Humulus lupulus L., which are effective against multi-resistant Gram-positive bacteria, including the methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), show promise [8,9].
In this study, samples from the infected decubitus ulcers, leg ulcers and surgical wounds of almost 10,000 patients were subjected to the microbiological analysis and identification of the level of bacterial resistance. This is the first study with such a large cohort of patients in this region. The results are used to define the therapeutic approaches to the antibiotic treatment, including the potential of application of hops extracts in those cases caused by the Gram-positive MDR bacteria.

2. Results

Samples from a total of 9762 patients with diagnoses of infected decubitus ulcers, leg ulcers and bacterial infections of surgical wounds were included in this study. In samples from 7693 patients (78.8%), bacterial etiologic agents were identified. Bacterial isolation was negative or non-significant in 21.2% of samples.
The isolated and identified bacterial species are shown in Table 1. The results show that there were 10,977 pathogens identified in total and the most prevalent etiological agent was S. aureus (21.1%). Gram-positive facultative anaerobic cocci (staphylococci, streptococci and enterococci) represent 44.6% of all bacterial etiological agents. Other important bacterial pathogens include members of the Enterobacterales (37.1%) and P. aeruginosa (12.7%).
When the susceptibility/resistance of the individual bacterial species to the currently used antibiotics was analyzed, the results showed the following (Table 2). Very alarming is the finding that almost half of the K. pneumoniae isolates (48.3%) were ESBL-positive and 25.6% of the Enterobacter spp. isolates were AmpC-positive. P. aeruginosa isolates (the third most prevalent bacteria) also showed various resistance phenotypes at dangerously high levels. Thus, more than 27% of those were resistant to ciprofloxacin and meropenem and 24.2% to piperacillin/tazobactam. The most frequently isolated S. aureus (21.1% of all samples) showed the MRSA phenotype in 199 samples (8.6%). Relatively high numbers of streptococci with the MLSB phenotype (resistance to macrolides, lincosamide and streptogramin B) are also worrisome. VRE were detected in 3.4% of all enterococci-positive cases, where 82.6% of those are represented by E. faecium with phenotype VanA and 17.4% by E. faecalis phenotype VanB. Relatively encouraging is the result that only 0.8% of the enterobacteria were resistant to carbapenems.

3. Discussion

The multicentric study presented herein analyzed the most prevalent bacterial strains found as causative agents in a cohort of almost 10000 patients from the Czech Republic suffering from infected decubitus ulcers, leg ulcers and bacterial infections of surgical wounds. Out of the total number of patients examined, 21% had clinical suspicion of infection with negative or insignificant bacterial culture results, but requiring antibiotic treatment with respect to the patient′s clinical condition. The reason for the negative or insignificant result could be the antibiotic treatment. A study with such a large cohort of patients has not been conducted in the Czech Republic to date and, moreover, it represents a pilot study from this European region. The results confirm that the most common bacterial strains in these infections are members of the Enterobacterales (37%), S. aureus (21%), P. aeruginosa (13%), Enterococcus spp. (12%) and Streptococcus spp. (11%). Our results are consistent with the study of Giacometti et al., who defined S. aureus (28%), P. aeruginosa (25%), E. coli (8%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (7%) and E. faecalis (6%) as the most frequent pathogens of wound infections in surgical patients [10]. Hedaoo et al. evaluated isolates from swabs/pus of surgical site infections and found that the most frequent ones were Klebsiella spp. (24%), S. aureus (20%), E. coli (15%) and P. aeruginosa (13%) [11].
The analysis of antibiotic resistance in the isolated bacterial pathogens confirms an alarming trend of increasing numbers of the MDR strains, namely of the enterobacteria producing the broad-spectrum beta-lactamases ESBL and AmpC, even in this large Czech cohort. Another upcoming serious problem is indicated by the finding of P. aeruginosa displaying resistance to selected antipseudomonal antibiotics within the range of 19–32%. In this cohort, MRSA and VRE also represented important pathogens, albeit with lower frequencies (9% and 3%, respectively). The high resistance of bacterial pathogens in infected surgical wounds is also confirmed by Hedaoo et al., who reports a 50% prevalence of MRSA. Additionally, more than 60% E. coli and P. aeruginosa showed resistance to gentamicin and more than 50% resistance to 3rd generation cephalosporins and ciprofloxacin [11]. The lower prevalence of MRSA in this study compared to other studies cannot be easily explained by the fact that hospitals differ in facilities and medical care approaches to their patients. One plausible explanation may be a differential utilization of beta-lactam antibiotics for the initial treatment.
The resistant bacteria in hospital settings are most commonly disseminated by the contaminated hands of healthcare workers and contaminated instruments or items of daily use [12]. Critically ill patients represent the most vulnerable group, in which the resistant bacteria cause serious and poorly treatable infections. This is a multi-factorial problem, which has to be solved using a complex approach. The basis of such an approach is formed by the rational application of antibiotics, as well as the implementation and adherence to proper epidemiological control measures with an active infection control approach aiming to identify resistant bacterial strains and limit their spread [13,14].
The results of the study presented herein can be used as a basis for antibiotic stewardship in infected decubitus ulcers, leg ulcers and surgical wounds. Antibiotic stewardship (AS) may be freely defined as a set of measures leading to rational antibiotic therapy based on adequate selection of antibacterial agents, relevant duration of their administration and a suitable route of administration. At the present time, it is essential to implement AS at all necessary levels. The AS system is rather comprehensive, containing a range of individual programs and activities, including (1) an adequate identification of bacterial pathogens in particular infections; (2) assessing the prevalence of pathogenic bacteria and their resistance to antibiotics; and (3) developing of local guidelines for the initial antibiotic therapy. Based on the obtained data, penicillin-type antibiotics with beta-lactamase inhibitors (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin/sulbactam or piperacillin/tazobactam) combined with gentamicin can be recommended for initial antibiotic therapy. However, the results of this study underscore even more the need to perform a proper bacterial analysis from the infected lesions as an integral part of the therapeutic approach. Once the etiological agent is identified, the therapy should be adjusted according to the species and, potentially, its resistance. This will lower the mortality and morbidity, speed-up the recovery and, maybe most importantly, prevent further selection of MDR bacterial species circulating in hospitals [5,6,7].
In this regard, the use of alternative/novel compounds with antimicrobial properties may present a suitable future direction for topical treatments. Our previous data suggest that extracts from hops, which showed strong antimicrobial properties against Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA and VRE, may represent attractive alternatives for such treatments [8,9]. Due to the data above, showing that staphylococci, enterococci and streptococci represent 45% of the bacterial pathogens isolated from bacterial nosocomial infections of decubitus ulcers, leg ulcers and surgical wounds, together with the occurrence of MDR isolates among them, this may represent a viable option for future treatments. Another promising therapeutic option, particularly for infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus, including MRSA, is the use of natural antimicrobial peptides [15].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patient Cohort

The study was performed in three large teaching hospitals in Czech Republic: the Faculty Hospital Olomouc (1212 beds), Faculty Hospital Hradec Kralove (1375 beds) and Thomayer Hospital in Prague (1063 beds), in patients hospitalized between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. These three hospitals were intentionally selected so that their sizes (numbers of beds) and the extent of care were comparable. Data were obtained retrospectively from hospital information systems.
The bacteria were isolated from the swabs of the infected decubitus ulcers, leg ulcers and infected surgical wounds from a total of 9762 patients using standard microbiological methods, i.e., aerobic cultivation on appropriate agars (Blood agar, MacConkey agar, Trios, Czech Republic). The swabs were collected as part of the standard clinical care.
Case inclusion criterion was the development of infection during hospitalization, at least 48 h after the admission for hospitalization. No case exclusion criterion was applied. Only the first isolate of a bacterial strain from each patient within a given year was included in this study. The clinical significance of the isolated bacteria was determined based on the clinical and biochemical markers of the bacterial infection, the quantity of the bacterial pathogens and, eventually, the repeated detection of identical bacterial agents. Bacteria from the skin surface, in particular coagulase-negative staphylococci and corynebacteria, in small quantities were considered clinically non-significant.

4.2. Microbiological Analysis

The identification of bacteria was performed by MALDI-TOF MS (Biotyper Microflex, Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). The susceptibility/resistance to antibiotics was tested by the broth microdilution method according to EUCAST [16]. The following bacterial strains were used as references for the quality control: Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, S. aureus ATCC 29213 and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212. The production of broad-spectrum beta-lactamases, such as ESBL and AmpC, was detected by phenotypic tests [17]. Positive results were verified by PCR detection of genes for the respective type of beta-lactamase. All strains of S. aureus were tested for the resistance to methicillin using selective diagnostic chromogenic media (Colorex/TM/MRSA, TRIOS, Prague, Czech Republic) and immunochromatographic assays for the detection of PBP2a (PBP2a SA Culture Colony Test, AlereTM, Abbott, Prague, Czech Republic). Positive results were confirmed by the detection of the mecA gene. The resistance to vancomycin in VRE was also confirmed by the detection of the vanA and vanB genes.

4.3. Molecular Biologic Analysis

The confirmation of the most prevalent mechanisms of the bacterial resistance to antibiotics was performed by the molecular analysis of the resistance genes. Thus, the PCR was performed using the reaction mixture containing 1 µL DNA (100 ng) in 24 µL complete reaction buffer with MgCl2 (containing 100 mmol Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 500 mmol KCl, 1% Triton X-100, 15 mmol MgCl2) (Top-Bio, Czech Republic; 2.5 µL), dNTP (10 mmol, 0.5 µL), 50 µmol of each primer (0.2 µL) and Taq DNA polymerase (Top-Bio, Czech Republic; 0.2 µL). The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 sec, at different annealing temperatures for 30 sec and 72 °C for 1 min, followed by a final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min. The primer sequences and calculated lengths of the corresponding amplicons are listed in Table 3 [18,19,20,21,22,23].
Four reference strains were used as the positive controls: CTX-M, TEM-1 and OXA-1-positive E. coli (NCTC 13400), SHV-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae (NCTC 13368), VanA-positive E. faecalis (NCTC 12201) and MRSA (NCTC 13142).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.B. and M.K.; methodology, P.M. and L.H.; validation, K.B., P.C. and K.N.; formal analysis, M.K. and P.C.; investigation, K.N., P.C. and K.B.; resources, K.N., P.C. and K.B.; data curation, P.C., L.H. and P.M; writing—original draft preparation, M.K.; writing—review and editing, P.B.; supervision, P.B. and M.K.; project administration, P.B.; funding acquisition, P.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Czech Health Research Council of Czech Republic, grant NV- 17-31765A.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Torok, M.E.; Moran, E.; Cooke, F. Oxford Handbook of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gajdacs, M. The Continuing Threat of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics (Basel) 2019, 8, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bone, R.C.; Balk, R.A.; Cerra, F.B.; Dellinger, R.P.; Fein, A.M.; Knaus, W.A.; Schein, R.M.; Sibbald, W.J. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992, 101, 1644–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Singer, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.W.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016, 315, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tumbarello, M.; Sanguinetti, M.; Montuori, E.; Trecarichi, E.M.; Posteraro, B.; Fiori, B.; Citton, R.; D’Inzeo, T.; Fadda, G.; Cauda, R.; et al. Predictors of mortality in patients with bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: Importance of inadequate initial antimicrobial treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007, 51, 1987–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Trecarichi, E.M.; Tumbarello, M.; Spanu, T.; Caira, M.; Fianchi, L.; Chiusolo, P.; Fadda, G.; Leone, G.; Cauda, R.; Pagano, L. Incidence and clinical impact of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL) production and fluoroquinolone resistance in bloodstream infections caused by Escherichia coli in patients with hematological malignancies. J. Infect. 2009, 58, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Herkel, T.; Uvizl, R.; Doubravska, L.; Adamus, M.; Gabrhelik, T.; Htoutou Sedlakova, M.; Kolar, M.; Hanulik, V.; Pudova, V.; Langova, K.; et al. Epidemiology of hospital-acquired pneumonia: Results of a Central European multicenter, prospective, observational study compared with data from the European region. Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky Olomouc. Czech Repub. 2016, 160, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bogdanova, K.; Kolar, M.; Langova, K.; Dusek, M.; Mikyska, A.; Bostikova, V.; Bostik, P.; Olsovska, J. Inhibitory effect of hop fractions against Gram-positive multi-resistant bacteria. A pilot study. Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky Olomouc. Czech Repub. 2018, 162, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Bogdanova, K.; Roderova, M.; Kolar, M.; Langova, K.; Dusek, M.; Jost, P.; Kubelkova, K.; Bostik, P.; Olsovska, J. Antibiofilm activity of bioactive hop compounds humulone, lupulone and xanthohumol toward susceptible and resistant staphylococci. Res. Microbiol. 2018, 169, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Giacometti, A.; Cirioni, O.; Schimizzi, A.M.; Del Prete, M.S.; Barchiesi, F.; D’Errico, M.M.; Petrelli, E.; Scalise, G. Epidemiology and microbiology of surgical wound infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 918–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Hedaoo, J.B.; Rathod, V.N.; Paramne, A.V. Bacteriology of surgical site infections and antibiotic susceptibility pattern in isolates of postoperative wound infections. Acad. J. Surg. 2018, 5, 16–20. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ho, M.L.; Seto, W.H.; Wong, L.C.; Wong, T.Y. Effectiveness of multifaceted hand hygiene interventions in long-term care facilities in Hong Kong: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2012, 33, 761–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Antibiotic resistance threats. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2013. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest_threats.html (accessed on 25 March 2020).
  14. Kaier, K.; Frank, U.; Hagist, C.; Conrad, A.; Meyer, E. The impact of antimicrobial drug consumption and alcohol-based hand rub use on the emergence and spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing strains: A time-series analysis. J. Antimicrob Chemother. 2009, 63, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Scudiero, O.; Brancaccio, M.; Mennitti, C.; Laneri, S.; Lombardo, B.; De Biasi, M.G.; De Gregorio, E.; Pagliuca, C.; Colicchio, R.; Salvatore, P.; et al. Human defensins: A novel approach in the fight against skin colonizing Staphylococcus aureus. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Available online: http://www.eucast.org (accessed on 25 March 2020).
  17. Htoutou Sedlakova, M.; Hanulik, V.; Chroma, M.; Hricova, K.; Kolar, M.; Latal, T.; Schaumann, R.; Rodloff, A.C. Phenotypic detection of broad-spectrum beta-lactamases in microbiological practice. Med. Sci. Monit. 2011, 17, BR147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Dutka-Malen, S.; Evers, S.; Courvalin, P. Detection of glycopeptide resistance genotypes and identification to the species level of clinically relevant enterococci by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1995, 33, 1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Chanawong, A.; M’Zali, F.H.; Heritage, J.; Lulitanond, A.; Hawkey, P.M. Characterisation of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases of the SHV family using a combination of PCR-single strand conformational polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2000, 184, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Oliveira, D.C.; de Lencastre, H. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002, 46, 2155–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Pagani, L.; Dell’Amico, E.; Migliavacca, R.; D’Andrea, M.M.; Giacobone, E.; Amicosante, G.; Romero, E.; Rossolini, G.M. Multiple CTX-M-type extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in nosocomial isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from a hospital in northern Italy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 4264–4269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Perez-Perez, F.J.; Hanson, N.D. Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase genes in clinical isolates by using multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 2153–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Steward, C.D.; Rasheed, J.K.; Hubert, S.K.; Biddle, J.W.; Raney, P.M.; Anderson, G.J.; Williams, P.P.; Brittain, K.L.; Oliver, A.; McGowan, J.E., Jr.; et al. Characterization of clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae from 19 laboratories using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards extended-spectrum beta-lactamase detection methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 2864–2872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1. Bacterial species isolated from infected decubitus ulcers, leg ulcers and surgical wounds.
Table 1. Bacterial species isolated from infected decubitus ulcers, leg ulcers and surgical wounds.
SpeciesNumber of SamplesPercent of Total
Staphylococcus aureus231421.1
Escherichia coli162314.8
Pseudomonas aeruginosa139312.7
Enterococcus faecalis10209.3
Klebsiella pneumoniae8998.2
Streptococcus pyogenes7246.6
Proteus mirabilis6806.2
Enterobacter spp.6365.8
Enterococcus faecium3293.0
Streptococcus agalactiae2852.6
Morganella morganii2302.1
Streptococcus anginosus2192.0
Other6255.7
Table 2. Bacterial species isolated from infected decubitus ulcers, leg ulcers and surgical wounds.
Table 2. Bacterial species isolated from infected decubitus ulcers, leg ulcers and surgical wounds.
Resistance PhenotypeNumber of IsolatesPercent of Total
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus1998.6
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci463.4
Streptococci of the MLSB phenotype18314.9
ESBL-producing Escherichia coli25815.9
AmpC-producing Enterobacter spp.16325.6
ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae43448.3
Enterobacteria resistant to carbapenems320.8
Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to meropenem38227.4
Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to ceftazidime26318.9
Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to ciprofloxacin44231.7
Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to gentamicin27419.7
Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to piperacillin/tazobactam33724.2
Table 3. Sequences of primers used for PCR for detection of resistance genes.
Table 3. Sequences of primers used for PCR for detection of resistance genes.
Targeted GenePrimer NameSequence (5′ to 3′) aLength (Bases)Amplicon SizeTm (°C)Reference
Enterobacterales
ESBLblaTEM typeTEM-FGCGGAACCCCTATTTG16964 bp5612
TEM-RACCAATGCTTAATCAGTGAG20
blaSHV typeSHV-FCTTTACTCGCCTTTATCG18827 bp5613
SHV-RTCCCGCAGATAAATCACCA19
blaCTX-M typeCTX-M-FATGTGCAGYACCAGTAARGT20593 bp5614
CTX-M-RTGGGTRAARTARGTSACCAGA21
blaOXA-1-like typeOXA-1FACACAATACATATCAACTTCGC22813 bp5615
OXA-1RAGTGTGTTTAGAATGGTGATC21
blaOXA-2-like typeOXA-2FTTCAAGCCAAAGGCACGATAG21702 bp5815
OXA-2RTCCGAGTTGACTGCCGGGTTG21
blaOXA-10-like typeOXA-10FCGTGCTTTGTAAAAGTAGCAG21651 bp5615
OXA-10RCATGATTTTGGTGGGAATGG20
AmpCblaLAT type, blaCMY type, blaBIL typeCIT-FTGGCCAGAACTGACAGGCAAA21462 bp6416
CIT-RTTTCTCCTGAACGTGGCTGGC21
blaMOX type, blaCMY typeMOX-FGCTGCTCAAGGAGCACAGGAT21520 bp6416
MOX-RCACATTGACATAGGTGTGC19
blaDHA typeDHA-FAACTTTCACAGGTGTGCTGGGT22405 bp6416
DHA-RCCGTACGCATACTGGCTTTGC21
blaACC typeACC-FAACAGCCTCAGCAGCCGGTTA21346 bp6416
ACC-RTTCGCCGCAATCATCCCTAGC21
blaMIR type, blaACT type EBC-FTCGGTAAAGCCGATGTTGCGG21302 bp6416
EBC-RCTTCCACTGCGGCTGCCAGTT21
blaFOX typeFOX-FAACATGGGGTATCAGGGAGAT21190 bp6416
FOX-RCAAAGCGCGTAACCGGATTGG21
Enterococcus faecium
Vancomycin resistancevanA/B genesVanA-FGGGAAAACGACAATTGC17732 bp6217
VanA-RGTACAATGCGGCCGTTA17
VanB-FATGGGAAGCCGATAGTC17635 bp6217
VanB-RGATTTCGTTCCTCGACC17
Staphylococcus aureus
Methicillin resistancemecA geneMecA-FTCCAGATTACAACTTCACCAGG22162 bp5318
MecA-RCCACTTCATATCTTGTAACG20
a For degenerate primers: R = A or G; S = G or C; Y = C or T.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kolar, M.; Cermak, P.; Hobzova, L.; Bogdanova, K.; Neradova, K.; Mlynarcik, P.; Bostik, P. Antibiotic Resistance in Nosocomial Bacteria Isolated from Infected Wounds of Hospitalized Patients in Czech Republic. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9060342

AMA Style

Kolar M, Cermak P, Hobzova L, Bogdanova K, Neradova K, Mlynarcik P, Bostik P. Antibiotic Resistance in Nosocomial Bacteria Isolated from Infected Wounds of Hospitalized Patients in Czech Republic. Antibiotics. 2020; 9(6):342. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9060342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kolar, Milan, Pavel Cermak, Lenka Hobzova, Katerina Bogdanova, Katerina Neradova, Patrik Mlynarcik, and Pavel Bostik. 2020. "Antibiotic Resistance in Nosocomial Bacteria Isolated from Infected Wounds of Hospitalized Patients in Czech Republic" Antibiotics 9, no. 6: 342. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9060342

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop